Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Lamar Owen
Тема Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)
Дата
Msg-id 39F9DFD7.ABE486FE@wgcr.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)  (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes:
> > Unfortunately RPM deems a dependency upon libpq.so.2.0 to not be
> > fulfilled by libpq.so.2.1 (how _can_ it know?  A client linked to 2.0
> > might fail if 2.1 were to be loaded under it (hypothetically)).

> There usually are no such problems, and I'm not aware of any specific
> to postgresql either.

There have been reports to the pgsql-bugs list and to the PHP list about
this very issue.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alex Pilosov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR
Следующее
От: Larry Rosenman
Дата:
Сообщение: (forw) Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR