Re: prefer (+) oracle notation
| От | Herbert Liechti |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: prefer (+) oracle notation |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 39EF74AF.59ED468@thinx.ch обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | prefer (+) oracle notation ("Edmar Wiggers" <edmar@brasmap.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: prefer (+) oracle notation
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "Edmar Wiggers" <edmar@brasmap.com> writes:
> > I'm not sure about the standard, but I really like Oracle's notation for
> > foreign keys:
>
> > select a.item_number, b.group_code_description
> > from items a, group_codes b
> > where a.group_code = b.group_code (+);
>
> I beg to differ --- IMHO, Oracle's notation is brain dead.
I agree. In my opinion the best syntax for outer joins was brought up
by informix. Ex:
SELECT a.f1, b.f1, c.f1
FROM a, OUTER( b, OUTER c )
WHERE a.key = b.fkkey
AND b.key = c.fkkey
Where b is outer from a and c outer from b. Precedence and
hierachical order is given by the parenthesis. Same example
FROM a, OUTER ( b, c)
b and c are outer from a. I find this syntax clear and logic without
any danger of missinterpretation
Best regards
Herbie
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: