Re: Precedence of '|' operator (was Re: [patch,rfc] binary operators on integers)

> Well, that's a good point --- it isn't going to get any less painful to
> fix it later.  Do we want to just remove the special treatment of '|'
> and let it become one with the undifferentiated mass of Op, or do we
> want to try to set up reasonable precedence for all the bitwise
> operators (and if so, what should that be)?  The second choice has a
> greater chance of breaking existing apps because it's changing more
> operators ...
> Thomas, any opinions here?

I'd like to see closer adherence to the "usual" operator precedence. But
I really *hate* having to explicitly call out each rule in the a_expr,
b_expr, and/or c_expr productions. Any way around this?
                         - Thomas