Re: RULE vs. SEQUENCE
| От | Hannu Krosing |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: RULE vs. SEQUENCE |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 39B380FA.F2903F94@tm.ee обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: RULE vs. SEQUENCE (Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>) |
| Ответы |
Re: RULE vs. SEQUENCE
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Karel Zak wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Jan Wieck wrote: > > > > I have a question... why RULE call nexval() and data in RULE statement are > > > differend than data in original stmt. > > ... > > But executor can knows that somethig was already executed, we can mark > some already executed expressions in rewriter and not execute it again in > final executor... like: ... > > IMHO this is a good point for 7.2 ... But if instead of nextval() you had random(), would you still want to execute it only once ? And how should postgres know ? ---------- Hannu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: