Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ned Lilly
Тема Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others
Дата
Msg-id 39996E05.C0739844@greatbridge.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на RE: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others  ("Dan Browning" <danb@cyclonecomputers.com>)
Ответы Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>)
Список pgsql-general
Oh, Dan, I'm not that clever... ;-)

But I *can* tell you that the market leading proprietary RDBMS products we
tested were not IBM, Informix, or Sybase.

Regards,
Ned


Dan Browning wrote:

> > Can you tell us what version of the (ahem) unnamed
> > proprietary products
> > you used? :-). For example if you used version 8i of an unnamed
> > proprietry product, that might be informative :-).
>
> Oh, but even if you can't tell us what version was used, I'm sure you could
> tell us that story about the monster you saw last week.  But which monster
> was it?  Was it the monster that ATE EYEs?  And I remember you once said
> there was a second monster, could you describe it as well?


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ned Lilly
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others
Следующее
От: Ned Lilly
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others