Re: configure.in / xml / quoting trouble
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: configure.in / xml / quoting trouble |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3991.1184938635@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: configure.in / xml / quoting trouble (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: configure.in / xml / quoting trouble
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Am Freitag, 20. Juli 2007 13:28 schrieb Patrick Welche:
>> Also, why did postgresql choose not to use automake?
> The was never such a choice made.
According to the archives, it was brought up a couple times around the
1999-2000 time frame, but no one ever made a case that it'd be worth the
pain of changing over. At the time, we had subprojects in the tree with
their own configure/build systems (odbc, libpqxx) and I think
automake-ification was considered a way to try to clean that situation
up. But now it's been resolved by kicking the subprojects out again,
and so I don't really see that automake has much to offer us.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: