Tom Lane wrote:
>
> hstenger@adinet.com.uy writes:
> > My goal is to make the backend accept erroneous commands, not falling
> > in *ABORT STATE*, but rolling back automatically, & continue accepting
> > commands.
>
> The way you're doing it, you might as well just not use transaction
> blocks at all. I don't think wiping out the effects of all preceding
> commands within the transaction counts as "recovering from an error".
Ok, maybe I exagerated, but kind of solves my problem. GeneXus, my CASE tool,
will send begin/commit pairs, so I must 'recover' automatically. I aimed
DB2-like behaviour, which I was told, aborts on errors within transactions, but
remains in a runnable state. Don't you consider it valueable whatsoever?
Haroldo.
--
----------------------+------------------------Haroldo Stenger | hstenger@ieee.orgMontevideo, Uruguay. |
hstenger@adinet.com.uy
----------------------+------------------------Visit UYLUG Web Site: http://www.linux.org.uy
-----------------------------------------------