Re: Re: 4 billion record limit?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Keith G. Murphy
Тема Re: Re: 4 billion record limit?
Дата
Msg-id 3981B94A.E0524AA0@mindspring.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: 4 billion record limit?  ("Martin A. Marques" <martin@math.unl.edu.ar>)
Ответы Re: Re: 4 billion record limit?  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>)
Список pgsql-general
Mitch Vincent wrote:
>
> There is something else that many aren't considering. In every application
> I've ever written to use any database I use ID numbers of my own making,
> always they're integer. 4 billion is the limit on any integer field, not
> just the OID so there are limitations everyone should realize when using any
> integer for any kind of record identification purposes..
>
That's an excellent point, especially considering that *sequences* use
an integer to hold their max_value, which is by default 2,147,483,647.
You cannot go larger than that, either.  I guess it's constrained to be
positive.  So OIDs give you more potential unique values than sequences,
far as I can tell.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Matthew
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Backup/dump of huge tables and performance
Следующее
От: Paul Caskey
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 4 billion record limit?