Re: Proposed new libpq API

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Chris Bitmead
Тема Re: Proposed new libpq API
Дата
Msg-id 3963C7C8.B7DC382@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Proposed new libpq API  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS-OO] Re: Proposed new libpq API  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
The Hermit Hacker wrote:

> One last comment .. when you say 'random access', are you saying that I
> can't do a 'PQexec()' to get the results for a SELECT, use a for loop to
> go through those results, and then start from i=0 to go through that loop
> again without having to do a new SELECT on it?

Random access means that the whole query result is in memory. If you
choose to use PQflush then you will no longer be able to go back to 0
and re-iterate. If you don't use PQflush then you can do what you do now
which is go back and iterate through. If you use PQflush it means that
you don't need to do that.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: [GENERAL] Revised Copyright: is this morepalatable?
Следующее
От: Chris Bitmead
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres