Re: Issue in GIN fast-insert: XLogBeginInsert + Read/LockBuffer ordering
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Issue in GIN fast-insert: XLogBeginInsert + Read/LockBuffer ordering |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3956139.1666673900@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Issue in GIN fast-insert: XLogBeginInsert + Read/LockBuffer ordering (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Issue in GIN fast-insert: XLogBeginInsert + Read/LockBuffer ordering
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 02:22:16PM +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I confess I don't understand why is it important that XLogBeginInsert is
>> called inside the critical section. It seems to me that that part is
>> only a side-effect of having to acquire the buffer locks in the critical
>> section. Right?
> Yeah, you are right that it would not matter for XLogBeginInsert(),
> though I'd like to think that this is a good practice on consistency
> grounds with anywhere else, and we respect what's documented in the
> README.
Yeah --- it's documented that way, and there doesn't seem to be
a good reason not to honor that here.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: