Re: Simple view confuses PostgreSQL query planning

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Simple view confuses PostgreSQL query planning
Дата
Msg-id 3948.1085079983@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Simple view confuses PostgreSQL query planning  (Manuel Sugawara <masm@fciencias.unam.mx>)
Ответы Re: Simple view confuses PostgreSQL query planning  (Manuel Sugawara <masm@fciencias.unam.mx>)
Список pgsql-sql
Manuel Sugawara <masm@fciencias.unam.mx> writes:
> I'm facing a wired problem. When I left join two tables PostgreSQL is
> able to do it fast using the corresponding indices, However, if I
> define a simple view (to format the data) on one of the tables, the
> left join does not use the indices. Is something wrong here?

> Definici�n de vista:
>  SELECT h.id AS horario_id, h.profesor_id, h.lu, h.ma, h.mi, h.ju, h.vi, h."s�", "d�as_atxt"(h.lu, h.ma, h.mi, h.ju,
h.vi,h."s�") AS "d�as_txt", h.hora_inicial, h.hora_final,
 
>         CASE
>             WHEN h.hora_inicial IS NULL THEN ''::text
>             WHEN date_part('minute'::text, h.hora_inicial) = 0::double precision THEN date_part('hour'::text,
h.hora_inicial)::text
>             ELSE (date_part('hour'::text, h.hora_inicial)::text || ':'::text) || to_char(date_part('minute'::text,
h.hora_inicial),'fm00'::text)
 
>         END AS hora_inicial_txt,
>         CASE
>             WHEN h.hora_final IS NULL THEN ''::text
>             WHEN date_part('minute'::text, h.hora_final) = 0::double precision THEN date_part('hour'::text,
h.hora_final)::text
>             ELSE (date_part('hour'::text, h.hora_final)::text || ':'::text) || to_char(date_part('minute'::text,
h.hora_final),'fm00'::text)
 
>         END AS hora_final_txt, h."sal�n_id", "sal�n_id_atxt"(h."sal�n_id") AS "sal�n_txt", h.nota AS horario_nota
>    FROM ordinario.horario h;

I think the issue is that the subquery isn't getting flattened, because
of this test:
       /*        * If we are inside an outer join, only pull up subqueries whose        * targetlists are nullable ---
otherwisesubstituting their tlist        * entries for upper Var references would do the wrong thing (the        *
resultswouldn't become NULL when they're supposed to).        *        * XXX This could be improved by generating
pseudo-variablesfor        * such expressions; we'd have to figure out how to get the pseudo-        * variables
evaluatedat the right place in the modified plan        * tree. Fix it someday.        */       if (...
(!below_outer_join|| has_nullable_targetlist(subquery)))
 

has_nullable_targetlist() is returning false because of the CASE
expressions.  Its analysis could be more detailed, but in point of fact
with this particular definition the targetlist *isn't* nullable ---
the first arm of each CASE will yield a non-null result for null input.
Get rid of the CASEs (perhaps you could wrap them into functions
declared STRICT) and the view would be flattenable.

The reason we need this is shown in this old bug report:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2001-04/msg00223.php
If the view did get flattened then the CASE outputs would give
wrong answers --- nonnull when they should be null --- just as Victor
described for constants.

The general fix mentioned in the comment is still a long way off.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Paul Gimpelj"
Дата:
Сообщение: v7.2 triggers and foreign keys
Следующее
От: Manuel Sugawara
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Simple view confuses PostgreSQL query planning