Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> writes:
>> Thanks for your thoughts, Tom. I have a couple of questions. Should we
>> introduce a new seed function for the new PRNG state, used by array_shuffle()
>> and array_sample()? What would be a good name? Or should those functions use
>> pg_global_prng_state? Is it safe to assume, that pg_global_prng_state is
>> seeded?
> I'd suggest to use the existing global state. The global state should be
> seeded at the process start, AFAIKR.
It is seeded at process start, yes. If you don't feel a need for
user control over the sequence used by these functions, then using
pg_global_prng_state is fine. (Basically the point to be made
here is that we need to keep a tight rein on what can be affected
by setseed().)
regards, tom lane