Re: jdbc driver: Why it isn't jdbcCompliant?

I wasn't making a point.  I was just including the comment from the
source code to tell why jdbcCompliant() returns false, namely that
postgresql isn't sql 92 compliant.

Gunnar R|nning wrote:
> 
> Joseph Shraibman <jks@selectacast.net> writes:
> 
> Yes - your point being ? I think that you will find that most JDBC drivers
> out there do not implement the spec. to the letter. But using good OO
> design principles and adapters you can easily use a subset of the spec(plus
> your favorite non SQL 92 database extensions) together with appropriate
> adaptors to keep things fairly easy to port between databases. The four
> databases that I know best Sybase ASE, PosgreSQL, Progress V9.1 and MySQL
> do not fully implement the JDBC spec. But then again I think SQL 92 is the
> same story...
> 
> Regards,
> 
>         Gunnar
> 
> > >From the Driver source code:
> 
> >   public boolean jdbcCompliant()
> >   {
> >     return false;
> >   }