Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Lockhart
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
Дата
Msg-id 390FA930.6F489F9B@alumni.caltech.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-interfaces
> My two cents: I wouldn't object to postponing release a day or so for
> it, *but* if what we're getting is an un-beta-tested driver then my
> level of enthusiasm drops considerably.  I'd rather say "it'll get
> fixed in 7.0.1, after a decent testing interval for the new driver".

Both versions of JDBC are in the Postgres source code tree. The newer
version has more standard conventions for Java namespaces (right
term??) and improvements in conformance to later versions of the JDBC
spec.

Basically the stuff is there already, and we just have a few file
updates to get it finalized. I'd be suprised if it is not ready by the
weekend, so it shouldn't be much of an issue.
                    - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: DBI and Pg error
Следующее
От: Thomas Lockhart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] 7.0RC2 compile error !