Re: Regression tests fail with tzdata 2024b
От | Wolfgang Walther |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Regression tests fail with tzdata 2024b |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 38e73fef-f19b-4835-b353-a110db6c8318@technowledgy.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Regression tests fail with tzdata 2024b (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Regression tests fail with tzdata 2024b
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane: > Also, as a real place to a greater extent > than "PST8PDT" is, it's more subject to historical revisionism when > somebody turns up evidence of local law having been different than > TZDB currently thinks. I now tried all versions of tzdata which we had in tree back to 2018g, they all work fine with the same regression test output. 2018g was an arbitrary cutoff, I just didn't try any further. In the end, we don't need a default timezone that will never change. We just need one that didn't change in a reasonable number of releases going backwards. Once America/Los_Angeles is changed, we need to switch to a different zone, which could be one that wouldn't work today. Kind of a sliding window. One positive might be: With this timezone, we are more likely to see relevant changes mentioned in the upstream release notes. Best, Wolfgang
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: