Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returnsmultiples

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Lockhart
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returnsmultiples
Дата
Msg-id 38BBD91C.E11F7547@alumni.caltech.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples  (Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> > A major release is a good time to adjust syntax to promote
> > compliance...
> I've been (lightly) bashed in the past for proposing such things (see
> END/ABORT) but I'm with you. I think that TEMP may be far too wide-spread
> by now, though.

Well, imho the TEMP issue is not identical to END/ABORT. For TEMP, we
are unnecessarily restricting the space of possible identifiers,
eliminating a common and obvious name. The fix is trivial, and the
affected parties are *only* those who use temporary tables and who
chose to *not* use SQL92 syntax, which was always available.
                   - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - return s multiplesh
Следующее
От: Karel Zak - Zakkr
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE