Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
| От | Thomas Lockhart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 38BB6BA6.B5FACCAD@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by -
returns multiplesh
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > If not, I'd vote for pulling it out. That's a heck of a poor word to
> > reserve.
> I am afraid of lots of user complaints, even if we had not already used
> TEMP.
OK, but we've already got "user complaints" about TEMP being a
reserved word, so that part seems to balance out. There is apparently
no basis in published standards for TEMP being a reserved word. And
btw it is not currently documented as a reserved word in
syntax.sgml...
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: