Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples
| От | Thomas Lockhart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 38BB5D9C.ED50B126@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples |
| Список | pgsql-sql |
> > Postgres thinks that TEMP is a keyword, so it won't take it as a table
> > name unless you put quotes around it.
> This is really an unfortunate case where someone should have read the SQL
> standard before putting in a feature. The SQL keyword is TEMPORARY, and
> TEMP is really a popular name for a dummy table.
So why not yank TEMP and require TEMPORARY? Saving an extra 5
characters of typing is not a good enough reason to keep it imho, and
if the SQL92 standard requires a particular form why bother extending
it?
A major release is a good time to adjust syntax to promote
compliance...
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: