Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 38BB5D9C.ED50B126@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples |
Список | pgsql-sql |
> > Postgres thinks that TEMP is a keyword, so it won't take it as a table > > name unless you put quotes around it. > This is really an unfortunate case where someone should have read the SQL > standard before putting in a feature. The SQL keyword is TEMPORARY, and > TEMP is really a popular name for a dummy table. So why not yank TEMP and require TEMPORARY? Saving an extra 5 characters of typing is not a good enough reason to keep it imho, and if the SQL92 standard requires a particular form why bother extending it? A major release is a good time to adjust syntax to promote compliance... - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: