Re: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS

Don Baccus wrote:

> At 11:32 AM 2/22/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >I see no way that allowing the transaction to commit after an overflow
> >can be called consistent with the spec.
>
> You are absolutely right.  The whole point is that either a) everything
> commits or b) nothing commits.
>
> Having some kinds of exceptions allow a partial commit while other
> exceptions rollback the transaction seems like a very error-prone
> programming environment to me.
>

It is hard to believe all world is wrong and only we are right. Isn't it ?
;)

>
> - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
>   Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
>   Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
>   http://donb.photo.net.
>
> ************

--
Jose' Soares
Bologna, Italy                     Jose@sferacarta.com