Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Chris Bitmead
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation
Дата
Msg-id 38A8C735.4E5A1280@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Solution for LIMIT cost estimation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation  (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Don Baccus wrote:
> 
> At 10:30 AM 2/15/00 +1100, Chris Bitmead wrote:
> 
> >It's a logical fact that the existance of "offset", automatically
> >implies
> >ordering, no matter how many SQL textbooks you quote.
> 
> Chris, that is your opinion and judging from the responses of other
> folks on this list, it appears to be very much a minority opinion.
> 
> Minority of one, as a matter of fact.  There has been a parade
> of posts disagreeing with your opinion.

I've heard no-one say that offset is meaningful or in any sense
useful in the absense of order. If it means something please 
enlighten us. If not, try reading before posting.

> Why not give up and get on with your life before I get tired of
> being polite?  I'm *much* more stubborn than you are, particularly
> when I'm right.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Lockhart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases
Следующее
От: Thomas Lockhart
Дата:
Сообщение: Great timing (not)