On Oct 19, 2025, at 2:48 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Incautious use of --with-segsize could perhaps result in RELSEG_SIZE
> being too big for an int ...
This must have been it, though the same --with-segsize value worked for larger blocksizes.
Perhaps configure could throw an error if too large of a value were to be used, but happy for the explanation...