> > Could someone run a "-d 99" query using the following from the
> > regression test (rules.sql):
> This doesn't look very detailed, is it really what you wanted?
Hmm. I expected to get a full plan (labeled "plan:"). Did you do the
query or just an "explain"?
I'm compiling this way, though I don't think that it matters for this:
$ gcc -I../../include -I../../backend -O2 -m486 -O2 -g -O0
-DUSE_ASSERT_CHECKING -DENABLE_OUTER_JOINS -DEXEC_MERGEJOINDEBUG -Wall
-Wmissing-prototypes -I.. -c copyfuncs.c -o copyfuncs.o
> Any changes in backend/optimizer/ ? I've got a bunch of uncommitted
> changes there myself.
Not too much. Though I've got a null pointer problem in executor for
mergejoins and I'm not certain where it is coming from. Here are the
files which have changed in the optimizer/ tree:
[postgres@golem optimizer]$ cvs -q update .
M prep/prepunion.c
M util/clauses.c
The changes are minor; I'm pretty sure I can remerge if you want to
commit your stuff (at least if your stuff is isolated to the
backend/optimizer/ part of the tree).
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California