The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > The big hope I see for postgresql is to someday be a true combination of
> > ODBMS and RDBMS. Current commercial ODBMSes suck because their querying
> > sucks. Current commercial (O)RDBMS suck because their object features
> > really suck. There is no fundamental reason that this must be so.
>
> I've asked this one before, I believe, some ppl have referred to us as
> already being ORDBMS "material", but am not quite sure what that means in
> our case ... how "ORDBMS" are we, and what is required to extend that?
As I mentioned, I wrote a web page a long time ago where I try to
express the
minimum enhancments required to turn postgres into an ODBMS.
http://www.tech.com.au/postgres