Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Chris Bitmead
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns
Дата
Msg-id 388CE21C.26602A5E@bitmead.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Double-yikes.  There goes that idea, or does it?  Attributes are
> numbered.  How does a missing attribute get handled for new rows?
> My guess is that we have to keep this thing around forever.  Can you
> imagine having all those user apps tha query pg_attribute supress that
> column.  Sound like too much work to me.

I don't know the intimate details of the postgres implementation, but I
would have thought every row would need a version number and you would
need to somehow store how the table looked at each version.

Because you could
CREATE TABLE
INSERT
ALTER DROP
INSERT/DELETE
ALTER DROP/ADD
INSERT/DELETE

and you would end up with rows with 5 or 6 different formats.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Patrick Welche
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers.
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] psql updates