Re: [HACKERS] Re: Status on 7.0

> Well, rather than creating a huge potential hazard for everyone two weeks
> before beta I'm going to settle for a cheaper solution (for now). There
> are just too many subtleties that one would have to address early in a
> devel cycle, so I'll put that on the the Forget-me-not list for 7.1.

Right.

> Instead I'd suggest extending the idea of gram.y's xlateSqlType to two
> functions provided by the backend
> type_sql_to_internal
> type_internal_to_sql
> which psql and pg_dump could use. Once we switch some or all datatypes
> over, this would be the only place we'd need to change -- until it's an
> empty function at the end.

Sounds good to me. Unless we embed this knowledge in a table
somewhere, which perhaps we should have done originally. But then we
would have lots of overhead on queries...
                   - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California