Re: pg_dump/restore failure (dependency?) on BF serinus
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_dump/restore failure (dependency?) on BF serinus |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3889418.1744087714@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_dump/restore failure (dependency?) on BF serinus (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2025-04-08 00:11:55 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> This feels quite adjacent to my complaint here: >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2045026.1743801143%40sss.pgh.pa.us >> though perhaps it's not exactly the same. > That does sound rather plausible. What an odd coincidence that it failed like > that so close to your email. While this specific failure probably couldn't > have happened much earlier, it seems that it could have as part of pg_upgrade > for longer. I think pg_upgrade is not vulnerable to the problem, or at least not the identical problem, because it doesn't expect pg_restore to load table data. So I think we didn't previously have any test cases that would expose this :-(. What I find surprising is that we didn't get field reports much sooner. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: