Re: Fix pg_upgrade to preserve datdba

Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info> writes:
>> On 3/21/21 12:57 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I think maybe what we have here is a bug in pg_restore, its
>>> --create switch ought to be trying to update the database's
>>> ownership.

> Thanks for that. I like this patch a lot better.

Needs a little more work than that --- we should allow it to respond
to the --no-owner switch, for example.  But I think likely we can do
it where other object ownership is handled.  I'll look in a bit.

            regards, tom lane