I still can't believe how fast you guys are, but would like to thank
you.
If I understood the vacuum logic, I would check your fixes, but it is
still black magic to me!! I did try the new code against the full
database and found no problems. As far as I can tell, you found it.
Thanks again.
Steve
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> > The following patch seems to fix your case.
> > However I'm not sure it's a right solution.
>
> That looks like nearly the same logic that I arrived at, although
> what I committed included some additional code cleanups. As I said
> in my prior message, I don't fully trust it yet --- but I am glad
> you came to the same conclusion.
>
> regards, tom lane