Re: [HACKERS] Hmm, almost-a-Y2K-bug in abstime regression test
| От | Thomas Lockhart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Hmm, almost-a-Y2K-bug in abstime regression test |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 38705FF9.A3C25187@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Hmm, almost-a-Y2K-bug in abstime regression test (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> It's not exactly a Y2K bug, because it started to fail at Dec 30 1999
> 23:00:00, your local time. Nonetheless, the abstime regression test
> is now showing a "failure". It's not a code bug --- it's that the test
> includes a query whose results depend on whether current time is before
> or after 12-30-1999. Boo hiss.
Ah, those short-sighted coders back in 1986 didn't even think about
Y2K coming along.
> Probably the best answer is to leave the test script alone and change
> the expected output. Thomas, do you have a different opinion?
Hmm. That's probably the right thing to do, but it just propagates the
poor form of expecting the system clock on a test machine to always be
set to something after the time the regression test was written. I
might reformulate the queries to reduce the dependency on current
time, assuming that we don't lose some of the testing space while
doing it...
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: