Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster options, process spawning, logging, etc.
| От | Tim Holloway |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster options, process spawning, logging, etc. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 38593D02.652337C7@southeast.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster options, process spawning, logging, etc. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Ah. I hadn't noticed they were that far back. I've passed your news on to our distraught friends in Columbia with a suggestion to try the 6.5.3 RPM. Tom Lane wrote: > > Tim Holloway <mtsinc@southeast.net> writes: > > 1. Matthew's problem sounds an awful lot like what's being reported > > by Lucio Andres Perez in v6.4.2. Maybe some kind of bug in detecting > > and handling over-the-limit backends. > > 6.4.* didn't really have any check/defense against spawning more > backends than it had resources for. 6.5 does check and enforce the > maxbackends limit. It's certainly possible that Matthew's running into > some kind of resource-exhaustion problem, but I doubt that it's just > the number of backends that's at issue, except indirectly. (He could > be running out of swap space or filetable slots, possibly.) > > regards, tom lane > > ************
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: