Vadim Mikheev wrote:
>
> Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> >
> > btw, I'm not really happy with the prospect/suggestion of going from
> > 7.0 to 8.0 in a short time period; one of things I'm most satisfied
> ^^^^^^^^^^
> > with in our development is that we have significant minor releases and
> > that we haven't succumbed to the "major rev only" marketing driven
> > ploys of the big guys...
>
> I agreed! I propose to name the next release as 6.6 ^^^ or
7.0
> and the "WAL" release as 7.0 or 6.7, but not 8.0... ^^^ and 7.1
Vadim