Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> btw, I'm not really happy with the prospect/suggestion of going from
> 7.0 to 8.0 in a short time period; one of things I'm most satisfied ^^^^^^^^^^
> with in our development is that we have significant minor releases and
> that we haven't succumbed to the "major rev only" marketing driven
> ploys of the big guys...
I agreed! I propose to name the next release as 6.6
and the "WAL" release as 7.0 or 6.7, but not 8.0...
Vadim