Re: [HACKERS] Last thoughts about LONG

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Hannu Krosing
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Last thoughts about LONG
Дата
Msg-id 3852A475.2361E57B@tm.ee
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Last thoughts about LONG  (wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
Список pgsql-hackers
Jan Wieck wrote:
> 
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> 
> > Please don't forget, this would require changes to pg_dump and psql. Also,
> > the COPY command might not be able to get away without changes, either.
> 
>     Oh yes, thanks. That was a point I forgot!
> 
>     Psql must not list tables that begin with "_LONG" on  the  \d
>     request.  Anything else should IMHO be transparent.
> 

If this is the main concern then start them with "pg_L_" and they will be 
ignored by the current implementation as well.

But of corse they will surface ad \dS , which may or may not be a good thing
as it makes it possible to list them without changing psql.

-----------
Hannu


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: The Hermit Hacker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release
Следующее
От: Hannu Krosing
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Last thoughts about LONG