-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Bruce Momjianwrote:
> I think there is concern that trivial patches wouldn't be submitted to a
> patch tracker, especially by new submitters. Again, I am willing to
> track the ones that aren't in the patch tracker, but then we have two
> places where patches exist (perhaps three with the wiki).
For new submitters, there's always going to be some set of hoops to
jump through. Whether it's emailing -patches, adding a ticket to a
Trac or bugzilla, or adding a wiki entry, there will be some process
that they need to conform to if they want their patch to get reviewed.
Personally I don't feel that using a patch tracker or wiki is any more
onerous than using an email list, and it's a whole lot more responsive
(i.e., doesn't require Bruce to personally and manually shift the
entry from -patches to the queue).
It's not like we'd be asking submitters to draw a chalk circle on
their floor and conduct an arcane ritual. =) It's just a website.
Cheers,
BJ
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://getfiregpg.org
iD8DBQFH/XU55YBsbHkuyV0RAg5DAJ9faAwOxlGPGmqkroHLjwkDpE0lWwCfcMrH
dDHcBjpQy5uspFljnv463/k=
=1Tuq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----