Re: psql show dbsize?
| От | Brendan Jurd |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: psql show dbsize? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 37ed240d0710312012x2c472120s3eebba5d431ebf93@mail.gmail.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: psql show dbsize? (Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: psql show dbsize?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/1/07, Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org> wrote: > tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) writes: > > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > >> Perhaps both these considerations dictate providing another command or a > >> special flavor of \l instead of just modifying it? > > > > I've seen no argument made why \l should print this info at all. > > Its interesting information, but I agree that there are BIG > disadvantages to adding it to \l directly. If there's an "\lv" or > such, where it's more certain that people want extended information, > and perhaps that they have appropriate permissions. I'd find this convenient too. Although \l+ would be more consistent with the \d series of commands. Cheers BJ
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: