Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Rosser Schwarz
Тема Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company
Дата
Msg-id 37d451f7050502135864ef3ed3@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company  (Rosser Schwarz <rosser.schwarz@gmail.com>)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
while you weren't looking, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Adjustments?

A couple slight tweaks and rephrasings:

<p>If you're looking for a PostgreSQL gatekeeper, central committe or
controlling company, give up; there isn't one. We do have a core
committe and don't hand out CVS commit privileges like candy, but this
is more for ease of administration than control. The project is driven
by the needs of the community of developers and users, which anyone
can join. All you need to do is subscribe to the mailing list(s) and
participate in the discussions.  (See the <a
href="http://www.postgresql.org/faqs.FAQ_DEV.html">Developer's FAQ</a>
for more information on how to get involved in PostgreSQL
development.)</p>

/rls

--
:wq

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvar Freude
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Следующее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ARCHIVE TABLES (was: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only.)