Re: Enable data checksums by default

On 27.08.24 15:44, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 3:46 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com 
> <mailto:nathandbossart@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Should we error if both --data-checksum and --no-data-checksums are
>     specified?  IIUC with 0001, we'll use whichever is specified last.
> 
> 
> Hmmm, that is a good question. We have never (to my recollection) 
> flipped a default quite like this before. I'm inclined to leave it as 
> "last one wins", as I can see automated systems appending their desired 
> selection to the end of the arg list, and expecting it to work.

Yes, last option wins is the normal expected behavior.