Re: [HACKERS] Compile timing
| От | Thomas Lockhart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Compile timing |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 37E9BCEF.57C8F6A8@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Compile timing (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Compile timing
Re: [HACKERS] Compile timing |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Not sure why -j2 is not faster than normal -j...
I was just looking at this a little while ago at work. It is not
faster because gmake does not propagate the "-j2" flag to submakes, on
the (correct) theory that you might get a geometrically growing system
load, rather than just keeping two makes running through all the
subdirectories.
This is the behavior of "-j", unless you specify it without a numeric
parameter, in which case it *does* allow parallel submakes.
The first time I tried "-j", I did it without reading the man pages
and without specifying a numeric parameter. It did a magnificent job
of bringing down my system trying to build ACE/TAO, a *large* Corba
package. Chewed up all of real memory, then all of swap; not sure if I
ran out of process slots or memory first but it wasn't pretty. It was
*very* fast though :)
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: