Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vadim Mikheev
Тема Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach?
Дата
Msg-id 37E5C733.ABE1902D@krs.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach?  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы RE: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach?  ("Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach?  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > Or shmem inheritance is not portable?
> 
> If it works on your machine with it removed, commit the change and I can
> test it here.   I don't know of any portability problems with shared
> memory children.

I wrote simple test program and it works under FreeBSD and Solaris
(on Ultra). Currently I'm not able to do more. Actually, I worry
does this work under MS Windows.

Vadim


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL?
Следующее
От: Dmitry Samersoff
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2