why do shmem attach?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vadim Mikheev
Тема why do shmem attach?
Дата
Msg-id 37E5AB7D.F8EA85D4@krs.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach?  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Exec-on-startup was removed by Bruce long time ago.
Why we still attach to shmem after fork?
Or shmem inheritance is not portable?
Also, all this ShmemIndex stuff seems to be useless
(except of backend PID lookup but it's for sure
should be in separate hash table).
And why separate shmem segment (!!!) is used for 
Slocks (ipc.c:CreateAndInitSLockMemory(), etc) - they
use so small amount of memory!

Just wondering...
I'm going to use old shmem init code for WAL but would like
to denote that shmem stuff need in cleanup.

Vadim


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Lockhart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: INSERT/DEFAULT VALUES broken?
Следующее
От: Michael Robinson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL?