Re: [HACKERS] Is "isolation" a restricted word?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Lockhart
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Is "isolation" a restricted word?
Дата
Msg-id 37DDB9F5.9CCBF433@alumni.caltech.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Is "isolation" a restricted word?  ("G. Anthony Reina" <reina@nsi.edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> > > This table had no problems previously; has the word isolation been used
> > > somewhere else as a SQL word?
> > And it's mentioned in the HISTORY file as part of the MVCC
> > changes. They're a couple of these 'gotcha' words that are part of
> > the SQL standard, but hadn't yet been implemented before 6.5 that have
> > tripped up people.

btw, it *is* documented as an SQL92 reserved word and a Postgres
reserved word in the big docs in the chapter on "Syntax".
                      - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Lockhart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Is "isolation" a restricted word?
Следующее
От: Andreas Zeugswetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Patch for user-defined C-language functions