Re: [HACKERS] Threads

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Lockhart
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Threads
Дата
Msg-id 37A6FA1F.DF2CC054@alumni.caltech.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Threads  (Duane Currie <dcurrie@sandman.acadiau.ca>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Threads  (Dmitry Samersoff <dms@wplus.net>)
Re: [HACKERS] Threads  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@wallace.ece.rice.edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> As well, a few have been asking about multi-threading.
> Any thoughts?

Threads within a client backend might be interesting. imho a
single-process multi-client multi-threaded server is just asking for
trouble, putting all clients at risk for any single misbehaving one.
Particularly with our extensibility features, where users and admins
can add functionality through code they have written (or are trying to
write ;) having each backend isolated is A Good Thing.

istm that many of the cases for which multi-threading is proposed (web
serving always comes up) can be solved using persistant connections or
other techniques.
                    - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Mega-commits to "stable" version