Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrey Borodin
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order?
Дата
Msg-id 37A534BE-CBF7-467C-B096-0AAD25091A9F@yandex-team.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order?
Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order?
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi!

> 2 февр. 2018 г., в 21:14, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> написал(а):
>
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:22 AM, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>> I can try to do this before next CF. But ISTM that EDB and Postgres Pro already have various flavours of similar
feature.Maybe they are planning to publish that? 
>
> I would definitely review that patch.

I've contacted Postgres Professional. Marina Polyakova had kindly provided their patch.
The patch allows to use libc locale with ICU collation as default for cluster or database.

It seems that this patch brings important long-awaited feature and deserves to be included in last v11 commitfest.
Peter, everyone, do you agree with this? Or should we better adapt this work through v12 cycle?

I'm planning to provide review asap and do necessary changes if required (this was discussed with Marina and Postgres
Professional).

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CALL stmt, ERROR: unrecognized node type: 113 bug
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why does load_external_function() return PGFunction?