Dan Wilson wrote:
> Yes, I am aware that the primary key does not really mean anything except
> implicitly making it a unique key, but it's supposed to be there for
> compatibility and it's not even in the dump.
Someone mentioned recently that primary key enforces nulls as unique
whereas unique index doesn't.
>
> It's not a huge deal, but I was wondering if there was reasoning behind it
> of which I am unaware.
>
> -Dan
--
Chris Bitmead
mailto:chris@tech.com.au
http://www.techphoto.org - Photography News, Stuff that Matters