Re: What happened to the is_ family of functions proposal?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: What happened to the is_ |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3790.1285084196@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на |
Re: What happened to the is_ |
| Ответы |
Re: What happened to the is_ |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I think it would be useful to have a way of testing whether a cast to
> a given type will succeed. The biggest problem with the
> exception-catching method is not that it requires writing a function
> (which, IMHO, is no big deal) but that exception handling is pretty
> slow and inefficient. You end up doing things like... write a regexp
> to see whether the data is in approximately the right format and then
> if it is try the cast inside an exception block. Yuck.
The problem here is that putting the exception handling in C doesn't
make things any better: it's still slow and inefficient. And in the
general case the only way to be sure that a string will be accepted by
the input function is to try it.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: