> I propose renaming res_target_list and res_target_el to
> update_target_list and update_target_el, and removing the alternatives
> that aren't actually valid for UPDATE.
> Having done that, we might as well rename res_target_list2 and
> res_target_el2 to something clearer (I'm thinking just target_list and
> target_el, but if you want to keep the "res_" I won't object).
Sounds good. I never poked very far into the usage of these clauses,
but istm that your suggestions would make things clearer.
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California