Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Lockhart
Тема Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status
Дата
Msg-id 377855FC.1A669355@alumni.caltech.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> > > First time for last two years -:)).
> > We must be starting to know what we are doing, eh? :)
> Interesting outlook.  :-)

Hmm. It is also the longest beta, longest period between releases, and
longest slip in release date. Not that those are bad; we apparently
got a solid release out of it.

I still can't believe that Vadim pulled off his huge changes! btw, I
upgraded a small production server at work which does plain-vanilla
SQL stuff and found that the following was *really* all it took to
upgrade from v6.4.2:
 pg_dumpall -z > file.pg_dumpall shutdown server change soft link to new tree build and install s/w initdb start new
servercopy pg_hba.conf psql < file.pg_dumpall
 

About 10 minutes total elapsed time. Pretty impressive imho.

I will have some patches for v6.5.1 (and v6.6, but they may be
superceded during the cycle by Tom Lane's suggestions) to allow the
Postgres packaged apps to be built as shared libraries. The patches
are almost trivial, though the build sequence to actually get
dynamically-linked apps is not.

Also, there is a new version of pgaccess which we could incorporate,
and the ODBC driver could be refreshed. I could also fix a few typos
in the docs...
                    - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Lockhart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Perl library (was Building Postgres)
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] acl problem in NetBSD/m68k