Re: BUG #19340: Wrong result from CORR() function
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #19340: Wrong result from CORR() function |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 375068.1764696127@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: BUG #19340: Wrong result from CORR() function (Oleg Ivanov <o15611@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #19340: Wrong result from CORR() function
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Oleg Ivanov <o15611@gmail.com> writes: > Yes, must be NULL in all the queries I have provided! > But PostgreSQL curr() returns numbers, wich is incorrect. Yeah, looks like roundoff error to me. In your example SELECT corr( 0.09 , 0.09000001 ) FROM generate_series(1,25) ; at the end of float8_corr we have 3754 PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(Sxy / sqrt(Sxx * Syy)); (gdb) i locals transarray = <optimized out> transvalues = 0x1b96da8 N = 25 Sxx = 3.2869204384208827e-34 Syy = 9.3266240309214617e-33 Sxy = -3.2869204384208827e-34 where ideally those three values would be zero (and we would have fallen out with a NULL result at the preceding line). It's fundamentally impossible to guarantee exact results with floating-point arithmetic, so if you are expecting that you need to readjust your expectations. But having said that, it does seem a bit sad that we can't detect constant-input cases exactly. I wonder whether it'd be worth carrying additional state to check that explicitly (instead of assuming that "if (Sxx == 0 || Syy == 0)" will catch it). You might find the previous discussion interesting: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/153313051300.1397.9594490737341194671%40wrigleys.postgresql.org regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: