Re: Restricting Direct Access to a C Function in PostgreSQL
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Restricting Direct Access to a C Function in PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3748638.1723390148@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Restricting Direct Access to a C Function in PostgreSQL (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes: > Sounds complicated. I would go with the GRANT approach. Make my_func() a > SECURITY DEFINER function, and revoke access to my_func_extended() for > all other roles. +1 > Another option to consider is to not expose my_func_extended() at the > SQL level in the first place, and rewrite my_func() in C. Dunno how > complicated the logic in my_func() is, if that makes sense. Another way to think about that is "push down into C the part of my_func() that you feel is necessary to make my_func_extended() safely callable". Personally I'd probably change my_func_extended() itself to do that, but if you feel a need to leave it alone, you could write a C wrapper function. Anyway my point is you might not have to move *all* of my_func()'s functionality into C. Think about what it is exactly that makes you feel it's unsafe to call my_func_extended() directly. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: