Re: The missing pg_get_*def functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: The missing pg_get_*def functions
Дата
Msg-id 3741.1367333396@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: The missing pg_get_*def functions  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> If all you want is SQL language functions, there is nothing to stop you 
> from writing them and publishing them today as an extension.

It's worth noting also that we actually *have* infrastructure for
updating extensions without initdb; unlike the initial contents of
pg_proc.  So this approach is more attractive than it might seem
on its face, assuming you are going to do this as SQL functions.
(I share the doubts expressed elsewhere as to how feasible that
actually is.)
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kevin Grittner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Remaining beta blockers
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Substituting Checksum Algorithm (was: Enabling Checksums)